VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORP., THR. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV., WASHIM vs SMT. PHULWANTABAI W/O NIMBAJI SARKATE AND ANOTHER — WP/243/2022
Case under Indian Evidence Act Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040009702022
Filing Number
WP/666/2022
Filing Date
13-Jan-2022
Registration No
WP/243/2022
Registration Date
13-Jan-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORP., THR. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV., WASHIM
Adv. MANGESH A. KADU
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. PHULWANTABAI W/O NIMBAJI SARKATE AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,MEHADIA ASHISH S.,MEHADIA SURESH CHANDRA,(LRS OF R
-
2.,MEHADIA SURESH CHANDRA,MEHADIA ASHISH S. 1123 1.
-
3.DATTA PRAHLAD KHAVAR
-
4.STATE OF MAHA., THR. COLLECTOR, WASHIM AT PRESENT REPRESENTED BY, SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFF.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: WP/243/2022 The Nagpur High Court held that under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the 12% annual interest payable under Section 23(1-A) is calculable only on the market value of land determined under Section 23(1), and cannot include the 30% solatium (compulsory acquisition compensation) under Section 23(2). The court quashed the lower court's order that had included solatium in the interest calculation and directed recalculation excluding solatium, following Supreme Court precedent in *State of Punjab v. Amarjit Singh*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Execution Petitions (No Adjournment Will Be Granted)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Execution Petitions (No Adjournment Will Be Granted)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh
-
09-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin S. DeshmukhView PDF
-
03-Oct-2022
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
05-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
05-Sep-2022
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote
-
05-Aug-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF
-
03-Aug-2022
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
05-Jul-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
05-Jul-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
07-Jun-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
07-Jun-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
20-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
20-Apr-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
13-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
13-Apr-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
05-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
05-Apr-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
29-Mar-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
29-Mar-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
22-Mar-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
22-Mar-2022
For Admissions - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
08-Mar-2022
For Orders -(Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo
-
08-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
07-Feb-2022
End Of Board -
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
18-Jan-2022
End Of Board -
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai
-
17-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban DeoView PDF
-
17-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/243/2022
Case Summary: WP/243/2022 The Nagpur High Court held that under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the 12% annual interest payable under Section 23(1-A) is calculable only on the market value of land determined under Section 23(1), and cannot include the 30% solatium (compulsory acquisition compensation) under Section 23(2). The court quashed the lower court's order that had included solatium in the interest calculation and directed recalculation excluding solatium, following Supreme Court precedent in *State of Punjab v. Amarjit Singh*. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts