MAHESH CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER vs HUKUMCHAND CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS — CAS/37/2026
Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 09th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040003922026
e-Filing Number
21-12-2025
Filing Number
CAS/270/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
CAS/37/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Judge
Lok - Adalat
Coram
Lok - Adalat
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed-Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER
Adv. DHIRAJ S. JOSHI
-
2.Shekar Chokhelal Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.HUKUMCHAND CHOKHELAL GUPTA AND OTHERS
-
2.Mohanlal Chokhelal Gupta
-
3.Leelabai Bharatlal Gupta
-
4.Shelabai Dinesh Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Lok - AdalatView PDF
Case Summary: CAS/37/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Nagpur High Court disposed of a second appeal concerning partition of property by accepting a compromise deed filed by all parties. The parties agreed to sell the disputed property and distribute the sale proceeds equally instead of proceeding with the earlier trial court's partition decree that had granted 1/6th shares. The court approved the settlement and refunded court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
For Orders -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
For Orders-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAS/37/2026
Case Summary: CAS/37/2026 The National Lok Adalat at Nagpur High Court disposed of a second appeal concerning partition of property by accepting a compromise deed filed by all parties. The parties agreed to sell the disputed property and distribute the sale proceeds equally instead of proceeding with the earlier trial court's partition decree that had granted 1/6th shares. The court approved the settlement and refunded court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts