SMT. MANJU SARAN WD/O HARENDRA BHUSHAN AND OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI CST Advocate - NITIN P. LAMBAT, ,SHWETA S. HANWANTE,FOR/R-SOLE,PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR,SUNILSINGH S. CHAUHAN,VIKRANT PANDEY,FOR/R-SOLE — FA/142/2019
Case under Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23. Disposed: --Admitted/Allwd/Granted/Rule Absolute on 08th March 2019.
CNR: HCBM040003242019
Next Hearing
25th January 2019
Filing Number
FA/168/2019
Filing Date
04-01-2019
Registration No
FA/142/2019
Registration Date
05-02-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th March 2019
Nature of Disposal
--Admitted/Allwd/Granted/Rule Absolute
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. MANJU SARAN WD/O HARENDRA BHUSHAN AND OTHERS
Adv. ANIL B. BAMBAL
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI CST Advocate - NITIN P. LAMBAT, ,SHWETA S. HANWANTE,FOR/R-SOLE,PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR,SUNILSINGH S. CHAUHAN,VIKRANT PANDEY,FOR/R-SOLE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR
FOR ORDERS -
FOR ADMISSION
NOTIFICATION -
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-02-2019 | FOR ORDERS - |
| 27-02-2019 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 25-01-2019 | NOTIFICATION - |
| 08-03-2019 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-03-2019 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR
This is a procedural order from the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) in First Appeal No. 142 of 2019. The case was heard on 17.04.2026, and the court adjourned the matter to 4.5.2026 to allow the advocate for Respondent No. 2 to file his power of attorney within two weeks. No substantive decision on merits was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a procedural order from the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) in First Appeal No. 142 of 2019. The case was heard on 17.04.2026, and the court adjourned the matter to 4.5.2026 to allow the advocate for Respondent No. 2 to file his power of attorney within two weeks. No substantive decision on merits was rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts