NATIONAL INTEGRATION EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCI, AKOLA, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANTOHER vs RAFIYA BI ABDUL NABI AND ANOTHER — WP/4455/2026
Case under Mah. Pvt. School (C of S) Regulation Act Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040001882026
Filing Number
WP/111/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/4455/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INTEGRATION EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCI, AKOLA, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANTOHER
Adv. PARAG ANIL KADU
-
2.EKRA URDU PRIMARY SCHOOL, AKOLA, THR. HEAD MASTER
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAFIYA BI ABDUL NABI AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Jun-2026
—
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by the National Integration Education and Welfare Society challenging the School Tribunal's order that had condoned a 12-day delay in filing an appeal under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The court found the delay minimal and the tribunal's reasoning—that the respondent's employment was at stake—justified, and therefore upheld the tribunal's condonation order with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4455/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by the National Integration Education and Welfare Society challenging the School Tribunal's order that had condoned a 12-day delay in filing an appeal under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The court found the delay minimal and the tribunal's reasoning—that the respondent's employment was at stake—justified, and therefore upheld the tribunal's condonation order with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts