RAJMATA JIJAU MAHAVIDYALAYA KILLE DHARUR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — HCBM30525572025
Case under Constitution of India Section 14 AND 226. Next hearing: 03rd January 2026.
CNR: HCBM030525572025
Filing Number
WP/38850/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Judge
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Coram
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJMATA JIJAU MAHAVIDYALAYA KILLE DHARUR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
Adv. CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE STATE PROJECT DIECTOR PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHTAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
-
3.THE PROJECT APPROVAL BOARD PAB PM USHA
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY
-
5.DES MD PALESA COMMERCE COLLEGE
Case History
-
03-Jan-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Third Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
15-Jun-2026
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to remove office objections in 37 consolidated writ petitions filed by Rajmata Jijau Mahavidyalaya. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court intervention, noting petitioners' apparent lack of interest after multiple adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Second Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
08-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (First Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to remove office objections in 37 consolidated writ petitions filed by Rajmata Jijau Mahavidyalaya. The court warned that failure to comply within this stipulated period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court intervention, noting petitioners' apparent lack of interest after multiple adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts