BALBHIM ARTS, SCIENCE AND COMMERCE COLLEGE THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — HCBM30525462025
Case under Constitution of India Section 14 AND 226. Next hearing: 03rd January 2026.
CNR: HCBM030525462025
Filing Number
WP/38842/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Judge
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Coram
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALBHIM ARTS, SCIENCE AND COMMERCE COLLEGE THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
Adv. CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE STATE OF PROJECT DIRECTOR PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHTAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
-
3.THE PROJECT APPROVAL BOARD PAB PM USHA
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY
-
5.BSP SANSTHAS SWA SAVARKAR MAHAVIDYALAYA BEED THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
Case History
-
03-Jan-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Third Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
15-Jun-2026
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 consolidated writ petitions filed by Balbhim Arts, Science and Commerce College and others against the Union of India and PM-USHA authorities. Finding no petitioner present for the third successive hearing on removal of office objections, the court granted a final two-week extension to cure defects, warning that failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the petitions without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Second Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
08-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (First Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 consolidated writ petitions filed by Balbhim Arts, Science and Commerce College and others against the Union of India and PM-USHA authorities. Finding no petitioner present for the third successive hearing on removal of office objections, the court granted a final two-week extension to cure defects, warning that failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the petitions without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts