SAIBABA PRATISHTHAN THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT BALAJI BHIMA GOUD AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/3746/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030525012025

Filing Number

WP/38810/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP/3746/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Mah.agri. Produce Mktg.reg.act 1963

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIBABA PRATISHTHAN THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT BALAJI BHIMA GOUD AND OTHERS

    Adv. TAHER ALI QUADRI

  2. 2.KAI BABA GOUD PATIL PRIMARY SCHOOL THR ITS HEAD MASTER

  3. 3.BHAGIRATHIBAI SECONDARY SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEAD MASTER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF MARKETING

  3. 3.THE JOINT DIRECTOR MARKETING

  4. 4.KRISHI UTPANNA BAZAR SAMITI BHOKAR THROUGH ITS SABHAPATI CHAIRMAN SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3746/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the petition challenging APMC's eviction order against school operators. The court found that petitioners' possession was illegal, as they occupied land through an unauthorized sub-lease from a now-liquidated society without APMC's permission. However, recognizing the schools serve 300-400 students, the court granted a six-month grace period during which petitioners may submit a fresh lease proposal to APMC for consideration, with mandatory vacation thereafter if the proposal is declined or no undertaking is provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3746/2026 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the petition challenging APMC's eviction order against school operators. The court found that petitioners' possession was illegal, as they occupied land through an unauthorized sub-lease from a now-liquidated society without APMC's permission. However, recognizing the schools serve 300-400 students, the court granted a six-month grace period during which petitioners may submit a fresh lease proposal to APMC for consideration, with mandatory vacation thereafter if the proposal is declined or no undertaking is provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case