KARANKUMAR LINGANNA UMRIWAD R.K. MENDADKAR AND VIJAY GANGALWAD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — HCBM30524952025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 03rd January 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jan-2026

CNR: HCBM030524952025

Filing Number

WP/38804/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Judge

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARANKUMAR LINGANNA UMRIWAD R.K. MENDADKAR AND VIJAY GANGALWAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTE KINWAT DIVISION THR ITS MEMBER SECRETARY

Case History

  1. 03-Jan-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 consolidated Writ Petitions (ST) relating to Scheduled Tribe caste certificates. On the third listing for removing office objections, no petitioner appeared. The court granted two weeks to cure the defects, warning that failure to remove office objections within this period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 consolidated Writ Petitions (ST) relating to Scheduled Tribe caste certificates. On the third listing for removing office objections, no petitioner appeared. The court granted two weeks to cure the defects, warning that failure to remove office objections within this period will result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case