ANITA NIVRUTTI SONAWANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/1207/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14 AND 21. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030523542025
Filing Number
WP/38688/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
WP/1207/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANITA NIVRUTTI SONAWANE
Adv. Kadu Shivraj B
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER JALGAON
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
THE COMMISSIONER JALGAON CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-02-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 15-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 10-03-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Anita Nivrutti Sonawane seeking removal of unauthorized structures encroaching on a 12-meter public road in Jalgaon City. The court found the petition deficient in material facts, including when the encroachment occurred, how many persons were involved, and why no objection was raised if encroachments existed before the petitioner's plot purchase in 2005, holding it unsuitable for Article 226 relief due to disputed factual issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Anita Nivrutti Sonawane seeking removal of unauthorized structures encroaching on a 12-meter public road in Jalgaon City. The court found the petition deficient in material facts, including when the encroachment occurred, how many persons were involved, and why no objection was raised if encroachments existed before the petitioner's plot purchase in 2005, holding it unsuitable for Article 226 relief due to disputed factual issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts