LATE JAYSINGH AMBU KUNJALE THR LRS AND OTHERS vs VINOD NARAYANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS — CA/2563/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030520752025
Filing Number
CA/38489/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
CA/2563/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LATE JAYSINGH AMBU KUNJALE THR LRS AND OTHERS
Adv. BHOKARIKAR MADHAV M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINOD NARAYANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS
Adv. ADV. C.V.JOSHI FOR R/6 AND R/8 IN PIL 1123
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
Case Summary: CA/2563/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the consolidated matter to 24 June 2026 as a final opportunity for hearing. The court appointed an amicus curiae advocate to assist in prosecuting the Public Interest Litigation since the original petitioners were not actively pursuing it, and ordered interim relief to continue until the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CA/2563/2026
Case Summary: CA/2563/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the consolidated matter to 24 June 2026 as a final opportunity for hearing. The court appointed an amicus curiae advocate to assist in prosecuting the Public Interest Litigation since the original petitioners were not actively pursuing it, and ordered interim relief to continue until the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts