DATTATRAY GOVINDRAO KADAM AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — HCBM30510232025

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,21 AND 226. Next hearing: 24th December 2025.

Next hearing 24-Dec-2025

CNR: HCBM030510232025

Filing Number

WP/37716/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Judge

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,19,21 AND 226
Mah.agri.universities Act 1983

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTATRAY GOVINDRAO KADAM AND OTHERS

    Adv. Deshmukh Himmatsinh D

  2. 2.SUVARNA RAOSAHEB BACHKAR

  3. 3.ANJALI MILIND DESHPANDE

  4. 4.RAJENDRA RAOSAHEB GADE

  5. 5.SUNIL BABAN RAJMANE

  6. 6.NAVNATH BHAGUJI DARADE

  7. 7.ANIL MARUTI DUBAL

  8. 8.SANTOSH POPATRAO SHINDE

  9. 9.VIDYA DEEPAK PIMPARKAR KUMBHAR

  10. 10.JAYASHRI RAMBHAU KAMBLE

  11. 11.AMIT SHIVRAM PAWAR

  12. 12.ANITA NANDKISHOR KSHIRSAGAR

  13. 13.VINAYAK JAGANNATH KALHAPURE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE VICE CHANCELLOR MAHATMA PHULE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY MPKV

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR DEAN AND THE CHAIRMAN SELECTION COMMITTEE

  4. 4.THE REGISTRAR AND THE SECRETARY SELECTION COMMITTEE

Case History

  1. 24-Dec-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted petitioners two weeks to remove office objections in 37 consolidated writ petitions. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further notice, as petitioners had previously failed to remove objections despite two extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted petitioners two weeks to remove office objections in 37 consolidated writ petitions. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further notice, as petitioners had previously failed to remove objections despite two extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case