VINAY ALIAS VINAYAK GAJANAN KARNEWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/945/2025

Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030501672025

e-Filing Number

10-12-2025

Filing Number

APEAL/13061/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

APEAL/945/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A,3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),126(2),189(2),,191(2),351(2),190

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINAY ALIAS VINAYAK GAJANAN KARNEWAR

    Adv. Prashant Prabhakar Giri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. R/2 SERVED,ADV. MADHAV GUDE FOR R/2 ( APPOINTED THROUGH LEGAL AID) 1123

  2. 2.VIKAS NAMDEO PANDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad granted pre-arrest bail to all appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 945/2025. The court found that while the informant alleged he was assaulted with caste slurs and lost five teeth on October 4, 2025, medical certificates showed only simple injuries to the upper lip and cheek with no tooth damage. The court determined that most accused belonged to Scheduled Castes/Tribes (exempting them from SC/ST Act provisions), specific allegations against Vinayak Karnewar were vague, and no custodial interrogation was needed since investigation was complete and a chargesheet filed. Each appellant was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions not to tamper with evidence or leave India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  13. 30-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  14. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  15. 16-Jan-2026

    For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  16. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  17. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/945/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad granted pre-arrest bail to all appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 945/2025. The court found that while the informant alleged he was assaulted with caste slurs and lost five teeth on October 4, 2025, medical certificates showed only simple injuries to the upper lip and cheek with no tooth damage. The court determined that most accused belonged to Scheduled Castes/Tribes (exempting them from SC/ST Act provisions), specific allegations against Vinayak Karnewar were vague, and no custodial interrogation was needed since investigation was complete and a chargesheet filed. Each appellant was released on bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions not to tamper with evidence or leave India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case