VAISHALI DHANESH BHALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — RA/3/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030496602025

Filing Number

RA/36737/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

RA/3/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAISHALI DHANESH BHALE

    Adv. Salgare Vitthal G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. KOTHARI PRATIK P. FOR R. NO. 2 AND 3 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: RA/3/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected Vaishali Dhanesh Bhale's review application, upholding the dismissal of her writ petition seeking compassionate appointment. The court found no error apparent on the record and ruled that the applicant's submissions merely repeated arguments already extensively considered in the original 2025 judgment. Key Reasoning: The court held that a delay of over seven years in approaching the court—from her husband's rejected compassionate appointment application in 2013 to the writ petition filing in 2021—disentitled her to relief. While the applicant claimed her husband suffered from schizophrenia (allegedly from 2018), the court noted this was already addressed in the original judgment and did not constitute grounds for review, which cannot be exercised as an appellate function or address questions of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    First On Board

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RA/3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RA/3/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected Vaishali Dhanesh Bhale's review application, upholding the dismissal of her writ petition seeking compassionate appointment. The court found no error apparent on the record and ruled that the applicant's submissions merely repeated arguments already extensively considered in the original 2025 judgment. Key Reasoning: The court held that a delay of over seven years in approaching the court—from her husband's rejected compassionate appointment application in 2013 to the writ petition filing in 2021—disentitled her to relief. While the applicant claimed her husband suffered from schizophrenia (allegedly from 2018), the court noted this was already addressed in the original judgment and did not constitute grounds for review, which cannot be exercised as an appellate function or address questions of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case