BAPU SHANTARAM GAVALI AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — HCBM30496412025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 15th December 2025.

Next hearing 15-Dec-2025

CNR: HCBM030496412025

Filing Number

WP/36719/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Judge

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Money Lending Regulation Act and Rules 2014

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAPU SHANTARAM GAVALI AND OTHERS

    Adv. PRADEEP GURUNATH TAMBADE

  2. 2.BAPU MAHADU NIKAM

  3. 3.BHARATI BAPU NIKAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES KANNAD

  4. 4.RANGNATH PUNJABA AALHAD

  5. 5.SAYED YUSUF SAYED CHAND

  6. 6.SAYED CHAND MOIN

  7. 7.SAYED WAHID

Case History

  1. 15-Dec-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to petitioners to remove office objections from 37 consolidated writ petitions. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further reference to court, noting petitioners' apparent lack of interest after two previous failed opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final two-week extension to petitioners to remove office objections from 37 consolidated writ petitions. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic refusal of registration without further reference to court, noting petitioners' apparent lack of interest after two previous failed opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case