HAYATBI GULABKHAN PATHAN DIED LRS GULABKHAN PATHAN DIED LRS HASAN GULABKHAN PATHAN AND OTHERS vs SHRIKRISAN KASTURCHAND LOHE TRUST SANGAMNER BEHALF OF TRUST SHIVDAS RAMRATAN HARIYAR AND OTHERS — WP/14088/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Dec-2017

CNR: HCBM030478802017

Filing Number

WP/38562/2017

Filing Date

30-Nov-2017

Registration No

WP/14088/2017

Registration Date

04-Dec-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Mah.university of Health Sci.act 1998
Bombay Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAYATBI GULABKHAN PATHAN DIED LRS GULABKHAN PATHAN DIED LRS HASAN GULABKHAN PATHAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. SHAIKH MAZHAR A. JAHAGIRDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKRISAN KASTURCHAND LOHE TRUST SANGAMNER BEHALF OF TRUST SHIVDAS RAMRATAN HARIYAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,Bajaj Anil S. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/14088/2017 The Bombay High Court dismissed the tenant-petitioners' writ petition challenging an eviction decree under the Bombay Rents Control Act, 1947. While the trial court had rejected the landlord's claims of bona fide requirement, material alteration, and subletting, it decreed eviction for default in rent payment. The High Court upheld this finding, determining that the petitioners failed to comply with the second demand notice (issued 19.12.1985) within the mandatory one-month period under Section 12 of the Act, as money orders were sent after the deadline expired. The court found no perversity in the lower courts' concurrent findings based on evidence appreciation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Part Heard - CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  10. 06-Mar-2026

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

  12. 18-Mar-2020

    Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  13. 05-Dec-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  14. 05-Dec-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 30-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14088/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/14088/2017 The Bombay High Court dismissed the tenant-petitioners' writ petition challenging an eviction decree under the Bombay Rents Control Act, 1947. While the trial court had rejected the landlord's claims of bona fide requirement, material alteration, and subletting, it decreed eviction for default in rent payment. The High Court upheld this finding, determining that the petitioners failed to comply with the second demand notice (issued 19.12.1985) within the mandatory one-month period under Section 12 of the Act, as money orders were sent after the deadline expired. The court found no perversity in the lower courts' concurrent findings based on evidence appreciation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case