MAYA NARHARI PUJARI vs STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND OTHERS Advocate - DESHPANDE SIDDHARTH RAMESH — WP/12362/2015
Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030472822015
Filing Number
WP/37571/2015
Filing Date
21-Dec-2015
Registration No
WP/12362/2015
Registration Date
21-Dec-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAYA NARHARI PUJARI
Adv. MUKHEDKAR AMIT ARUNKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND OTHERS Advocate - DESHPANDE SIDDHARTH RAMESH
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
The writ petition was adjourned to 23.06.2026. The petitioner's advocate informed the court that settlement negotiations were ongoing with expected resolution within one week. The court, while expressing doubt about the petition's maintainability, agreed to stand over the case pending settlement discussions, with the petitioner required to address maintainability on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
08-Jan-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. BadarView PDF
-
08-Jan-2016
Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar
-
22-Dec-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice A. I. S. CheemaView PDF
-
22-Dec-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2015
Case filed
Registration No. WP/12362/2015
The writ petition was adjourned to 23.06.2026. The petitioner's advocate informed the court that settlement negotiations were ongoing with expected resolution within one week. The court, while expressing doubt about the petition's maintainability, agreed to stand over the case pending settlement discussions, with the petitioner required to address maintainability on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts