ANAND HARIBHAU MANE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APEAL/876/2025
Case under S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 14A(2), 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va). Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030467032025
e-Filing Number
19-11-2025
Filing Number
APEAL/12167/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2025
Registration No
APEAL/876/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANAND HARIBHAU MANE AND OTHERS
Adv. DOUND SUSMITA V
AKASH DEEPAK WAGHMARE
PRUTHWIRAJ SHRIRAM TARPE
SAHIL SANJIV BHAVARE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. R/2 SERVED,ADV. AARTI T. GHADGE FOR R.NO. 2 (APPOINTED) 1123
VIKAS NAMDEO PANDE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-11-2025 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS |
| 17-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 02-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 16-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 06-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
Orders
Case Summary: APEAL/876/2025 Decision: The Aurangabad High Court allowed the pre-arrest bail appeals of all four appellants (Anand Haribhau Mane, Akash Deepak Waghmare, Pruthwiraj Shriram Tarpe, and Sahil Sanjiv Bhavare), granting them bail on furnishing personal and surety bonds of ₹50,000 each. Key Reasoning: The court found that: (1) most accused belong to Scheduled Castes/Tribes, making SC & ST Act provisions inapplicable; (2) specific allegations against accused Vinayak were vague with no clear evidence of his participation; (3) medical records showed only simple injuries to the victim's lip and cheek, contradicting claims of five lost teeth, thus Section 117(2) BNS (grievous injury) did not apply; and (4) investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, eliminating need for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APEAL/876/2025 Decision: The Aurangabad High Court allowed the pre-arrest bail appeals of all four appellants (Anand Haribhau Mane, Akash Deepak Waghmare, Pruthwiraj Shriram Tarpe, and Sahil Sanjiv Bhavare), granting them bail on furnishing personal and surety bonds of ₹50,000 each. Key Reasoning: The court found that: (1) most accused belong to Scheduled Castes/Tribes, making SC & ST Act provisions inapplicable; (2) specific allegations against accused Vinayak were vague with no clear evidence of his participation; (3) medical records showed only simple injuries to the victim's lip and cheek, contradicting claims of five lost teeth, thus Section 117(2) BNS (grievous injury) did not apply; and (4) investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, eliminating need for custodial interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts