SAROJ KRISHNAN KUTTI THROU HER GPA NASER GANI KHAN vs PATRIC JOSEPH ALIAS PATRIC KESHAVAN — WP/4962/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030464782024
Filing Number
WP/33285/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
WP/4962/2025
Registration Date
15-04-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAROJ KRISHNAN KUTTI THROU HER GPA NASER GANI KHAN
Adv. Magar Balasaheb N
Respondent(s)
PATRIC JOSEPH ALIAS PATRIC KESHAVAN
Adv. GUNDRE SURAJ V FOR R. SOLE 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME)
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-01-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 03-02-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 10-02-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME) |
| 24-02-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME) |
| 23-04-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition but upheld the trial court's decision allowing the plaintiff's late amendment to the plaint. The court found that the amendment—adding details about the property's original ownership by Armed Static Workshop Housing Society—did not change the suit's nature (recovery of possession) and caused no prejudice to the defendant, since cross-examination had not yet begun. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 on the plaintiff for the belated amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition but upheld the trial court's decision allowing the plaintiff's late amendment to the plaint. The court found that the amendment—adding details about the property's original ownership by Armed Static Workshop Housing Society—did not change the suit's nature (recovery of possession) and caused no prejudice to the defendant, since cross-examination had not yet begun. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 on the plaintiff for the belated amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts