UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY MUMBAI AND ORS. vs RAGHUNATH ANNA KARADE — FA/727/2026
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030455812024
e-Filing Number
24-11-2024
Filing Number
FA/32615/2024
Filing Date
28-Nov-2024
Registration No
FA/727/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY MUMBAI AND ORS.
Adv. Talhar Ajay G.
-
2.The Deputy Chief Engineer Construction Central Railway
-
3.The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector
-
4.The Deputy Collector Land Acquisition Jayakwadi Project Beed
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAGHUNATH ANNA KARADE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed Central Railway's appeal challenging the Reference Court's enhancement of land compensation from Rs. 900/- to Rs. 3,500/- per R for Jirayat land acquired in village Pokhari for a railway project. The court found the Reference Court's rate reasonable, supported by compatible sale deed evidence, and within government guidelines permitting four-fold enhancement. Statutory benefits including solatium and interest were upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. FA/727/2026
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed Central Railway's appeal challenging the Reference Court's enhancement of land compensation from Rs. 900/- to Rs. 3,500/- per R for Jirayat land acquired in village Pokhari for a railway project. The court found the Reference Court's rate reasonable, supported by compatible sale deed evidence, and within government guidelines permitting four-fold enhancement. Statutory benefits including solatium and interest were upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts