BHARAT TOTARAM GAIKWAD vs SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN — WP/15078/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030455032019
Filing Number
WP/35065/2019
Filing Date
11-Nov-2019
Registration No
WP/15078/2019
Registration Date
13-Dec-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS(INDUSTRIAL DISPUTESAND RELATED ENACTMENT) ( 19 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARAT TOTARAM GAIKWAD
Adv. Patil Sandesh R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN
Adv. R.SOLE SERVED,Adv D. P. Bakshi for Rsole,PATIL VINOD PRAKASH FOR R.NO. 1 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad quashed the Labour Court's order that had set aside an ex-parte industrial award, holding that applications to set aside ex-parte awards must be filed within 30 days under Rule 26 of the Industrial Disputes (Maharashtra) Rules, 1957, and the Labour Court loses jurisdiction to entertain late applications. However, the court clarified that the respondent remains free to challenge the ex-parte award through other appropriate legal proceedings available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
22-Apr-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
15-Apr-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
30-Mar-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
16-Mar-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
17-Feb-2026
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
10-Feb-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
-
12-Dec-2025
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
08-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
11-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant
-
15-Apr-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
15-Mar-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
16-Feb-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
05-Jan-2024
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
09-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
09-Nov-2023
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
11-Sep-2023
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
10-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. SuryawanshiView PDF
-
10-Aug-2023
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
20-Apr-2020
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
16-Mar-2020
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
14-Feb-2020
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo
-
16-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
16-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15078/2019
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad quashed the Labour Court's order that had set aside an ex-parte industrial award, holding that applications to set aside ex-parte awards must be filed within 30 days under Rule 26 of the Industrial Disputes (Maharashtra) Rules, 1957, and the Labour Court loses jurisdiction to entertain late applications. However, the court clarified that the respondent remains free to challenge the ex-parte award through other appropriate legal proceedings available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts