SAYED HAFEEZ SAYED AHMED NALGIRE vs MAROTI SAKHARAM BHOGE AND ANOTHER — SA/926/2022
Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030449932022
Filing Number
SA/33271/2022
Filing Date
12-Dec-2022
Registration No
SA/926/2022
Registration Date
26-Dec-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAYED HAFEEZ SAYED AHMED NALGIRE
Adv. TUKARAM MARUTI VENJANE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAROTI SAKHARAM BHOGE AND ANOTHER
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
Case Summary: SA 926/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the second appeal filed by Sayed Hafeez Sayed Ahmed Nalgire against Maroti Sakharam Bhoge on May 4, 2026. The Court identified three substantial questions of law regarding whether Defendant No. 2 proved himself a bonafide purchaser, whether the matter should be remanded under Section 151 CPC for Defendant No. 2 to lead evidence, and whether the lower courts' findings were perverse. The case was adjourned with notice to respondents returnable on June 22, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
-
06-Jan-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
15-Dec-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
21-Nov-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. SA/926/2022
Case Summary: SA 926/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard the second appeal filed by Sayed Hafeez Sayed Ahmed Nalgire against Maroti Sakharam Bhoge on May 4, 2026. The Court identified three substantial questions of law regarding whether Defendant No. 2 proved himself a bonafide purchaser, whether the matter should be remanded under Section 151 CPC for Defendant No. 2 to lead evidence, and whether the lower courts' findings were perverse. The case was adjourned with notice to respondents returnable on June 22, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts