SAMAJ PRABODHAN MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIRKUMAR SHIVLINGAPPA SARSAMBE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/796/2016
Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030449212016
Next Hearing
01st December 2016
Filing Number
CP/35872/2016
Filing Date
29-11-2016
Registration No
CP/796/2016
Registration Date
29-11-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMAJ PRABODHAN MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIRKUMAR SHIVLINGAPPA SARSAMBE
Adv. SALUNKE VASANT DIGAMBARRAO
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. R/3 SERVED,R/3 SERVED,R/2 SERVED.,Adwant S.V.,INGOLE R K 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-03-2017 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 27-01-2017 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 24-03-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 28-04-2017 | URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL |
| 01-12-2016 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
Orders
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of four contempt petitions filed by Samaj Prabodhan Mandal and Vikalang Vikas Shikshan Sanstha against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that all orders under contempt had been complied with, as evidenced by written communications placed on record by the petitioners, leaving nothing to be adjudicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of four contempt petitions filed by Samaj Prabodhan Mandal and Vikalang Vikas Shikshan Sanstha against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that all orders under contempt had been complied with, as evidenced by written communications placed on record by the petitioners, leaving nothing to be adjudicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts