VIKALANG VIKAS SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIRKUMAR SHIVLINGAPPA SARSAMBE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/794/2016

Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Dec-2016

CNR: HCBM030449202016

Filing Number

CP/35871/2016

Filing Date

29-Nov-2016

Registration No

CP/794/2016

Registration Date

29-Nov-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKALANG VIKAS SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIRKUMAR SHIVLINGAPPA SARSAMBE

    Adv. SALUNKE VASANT DIGAMBARRAO,UMAKANT TOTAWAD (DIST.SOC. WELFARE OFF.) SERVED,UMAKANT TOTAWAD (DIST.SOC. WELFARE OFF.) SERVED, UMAKANT TOTAWAD (DIST.SOC. WELFARE OFF.) SERVED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. R/2 & 3 SERVED,INGOLE R K,Adwant S.V. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of four contempt petitions filed by Samaj Prabhodhan Mandal and Vikalang Vikas Shikshan Sanstha against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the contempt orders had already been fully complied with, as evidenced by written communications placed on record by the petitioners, rendering the petitions infructuous and warranting their dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2020

    Due Admission CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  4. 04-Sep-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  5. 04-Sep-2018

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  6. 08-Aug-2018

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal

  7. 20-Jun-2018

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal

  8. 18-Apr-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. DhavaleView PDF

  9. 18-Apr-2018

    Urgent Circulation (Wp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale

  10. 08-Sep-2017

    Urgent Circulation (Wp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde , Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi

  11. 03-Apr-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S V GangapurwalaView PDF

  12. 03-Apr-2017

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala

  13. 17-Mar-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S V GangapurwalaView PDF

  14. 17-Mar-2017

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala

  15. 27-Feb-2017

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane

  16. 27-Jan-2017

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane

  17. 01-Dec-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. WadaneView PDF

  18. 01-Dec-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 29-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/794/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of four contempt petitions filed by Samaj Prabhodhan Mandal and Vikalang Vikas Shikshan Sanstha against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the contempt orders had already been fully complied with, as evidenced by written communications placed on record by the petitioners, rendering the petitions infructuous and warranting their dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case