Union of India Through The General Manager Central Railway Mumbai AJAY GAJANAN TALHAR vs Lochanabai Chandrabhan Phad — CA/13436/2024
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030447402024
e-Filing Number
17-11-2024
Filing Number
CA/32023/2024
Filing Date
22-Nov-2024
Registration No
CA/13436/2024
Registration Date
12-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Union of India Through The General Manager Central Railway Mumbai AJAY GAJANAN TALHAR
-
2.The Deputy Chief Engineer Construction Central Railway Pune
-
3.The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector Beed
-
4.The Deputy Collector Land Acquisition
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lochanabai Chandrabhan Phad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Civil Application No. 13436/2024, a first appeal by the Union of India and Central Railway against Lochanabai Chandrabhan Phad, by declaring the civil applications as not surviving following the disposal of the underlying first appeals. The court simply noted that since the first appeals had been disposed, the civil applications no longer had utility and were accordingly closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
24-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
22-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CA/13436/2024
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Civil Application No. 13436/2024, a first appeal by the Union of India and Central Railway against Lochanabai Chandrabhan Phad, by declaring the civil applications as not surviving following the disposal of the underlying first appeals. The court simply noted that since the first appeals had been disposed, the civil applications no longer had utility and were accordingly closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts