UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD MR ATUL BHASKAR GATNE vs AMRUTA EKNATH GOPAL — FA/3329/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030445562025

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

30-10-2025

Filing Number

FA/33001/2025

Filing Date

06-11-2025

Registration No

FA/3329/2025

Registration Date

05-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD MR ATUL BHASKAR GATNE

Respondent(s)

AMRUTA EKNATH GOPAL

Adv. R/2 TO 4 SERVED 1123

AJIS RANNU LALEWALE

AKASH MANIKRAO MULE

IBRAHIM KALU KALIWALE

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

08-12-2025

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

08-05-2026

FOR ORDERS

09-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Registry to accept a cheque from United India Insurance Co Ltd as payment towards the impugned judgment and award, with a deadline of 21.04.2026 for deposit. The appellant was granted an extension after initially missing the twelve-week deadline set on 08.12.2025. Interim relief shall continue subject to the cheque deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) directed the Registry to accept a cheque from United India Insurance Co Ltd as payment towards the impugned judgment and award, with a deadline of 21.04.2026 for deposit. The appellant was granted an extension after initially missing the twelve-week deadline set on 08.12.2025. Interim relief shall continue subject to the cheque deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case