M/S. SHINDE AND SONS, THROUGH IT S PARTNER SATISH BUDHAJIRAO SHINDE vs GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANO.... — CARBA/1/2019

Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Dec-2018

CNR: HCBM030445502018

Filing Number

CARBA/35126/2018

Filing Date

19-Nov-2018

Registration No

CARBA/1/2019

Registration Date

08-Feb-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SHINDE AND SONS, THROUGH IT S PARTNER SATISH BUDHAJIRAO SHINDE

    Adv. NAIK THIGLE GIRISH K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANO....

    Adv. R/1.,(COPY NOT SERVED) 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed an appeal challenging the District Court's decision to set aside an arbitral award of ₹1,02,45,34,130/- in favor of a construction contractor. The court upheld the award's cancellation, finding that the arbitrator proceeded in a hasty, ex-parte manner despite pending litigation over his appointment, failed to properly follow statutory procedure under Section 25 of the Arbitration Act, and issued an award lacking sufficient evidence and appearing biased against the respondent government corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  9. 26-Oct-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  10. 05-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  11. 05-Oct-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 06-Sep-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  13. 03-Aug-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  14. 27-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  15. 06-Jul-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  16. 05-Jul-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  17. 13-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  18. 20-Apr-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  19. 03-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  20. 03-Feb-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  21. 07-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  22. 07-Jan-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  23. 08-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  24. 13-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  25. 18-Dec-2019

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor

  26. 27-Nov-2019

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor

  27. 13-Nov-2019

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor

  28. 06-Nov-2019

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor

  29. 26-Sep-2019

    Commercial Arbitration Appeal [For Admission]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  30. 04-Feb-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. GavhaneView PDF

  31. 04-Feb-2019

    Due Orders- CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane

  32. 07-Dec-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF

  33. 07-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBA/1/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed an appeal challenging the District Court's decision to set aside an arbitral award of ₹1,02,45,34,130/- in favor of a construction contractor. The court upheld the award's cancellation, finding that the arbitrator proceeded in a hasty, ex-parte manner despite pending litigation over his appointment, failed to properly follow statutory procedure under Section 25 of the Arbitration Act, and issued an award lacking sufficient evidence and appearing biased against the respondent government corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case