M/S. SHINDE AND SONS, THROUGH IT S PARTNER SATISH BUDHAJIRAO SHINDE vs GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANO.... — CARBA/1/2019
Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030445502018
Next Hearing
07th December 2018
Filing Number
CARBA/35126/2018
Filing Date
19-11-2018
Registration No
CARBA/1/2019
Registration Date
08-02-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. SHINDE AND SONS, THROUGH IT S PARTNER SATISH BUDHAJIRAO SHINDE
Adv. NAIK THIGLE GIRISH K
Respondent(s)
GODAWARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANO....
Adv. R/1.,(COPY NOT SERVED) 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL [FOR ADMISSION]
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
DUE ORDERS- CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-09-2019 | COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL [FOR ADMISSION] |
| 06-11-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 07-12-2018 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 27-11-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 04-02-2019 | DUE ORDERS- CIVIL |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed an appeal challenging the District Court's decision to set aside an arbitral award of ₹1,02,45,34,130/- in favor of a construction contractor. The court upheld the award's cancellation, finding that the arbitrator proceeded in a hasty, ex-parte manner despite pending litigation over his appointment, failed to properly follow statutory procedure under Section 25 of the Arbitration Act, and issued an award lacking sufficient evidence and appearing biased against the respondent government corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed an appeal challenging the District Court's decision to set aside an arbitral award of ₹1,02,45,34,130/- in favor of a construction contractor. The court upheld the award's cancellation, finding that the arbitrator proceeded in a hasty, ex-parte manner despite pending litigation over his appointment, failed to properly follow statutory procedure under Section 25 of the Arbitration Act, and issued an award lacking sufficient evidence and appearing biased against the respondent government corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts