SHAILA KISHOR AGRAWA AND ANOTHER ., KAZI S S (CONSAINT OBTAINED) vs BHAGWANSING SHIVSING DOBHAL AND ANOTHER — SA/189/2022

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030441662021

Filing Number

SA/34688/2021

Filing Date

23-Dec-2021

Registration No

SA/189/2022

Registration Date

11-Apr-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAILA KISHOR AGRAWA AND ANOTHER ., KAZI S S (CONSAINT OBTAINED)

  2. 2.SWETA KISHOR AGRAWAL ALIAS SWETA ASHISH KANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWANSING SHIVSING DOBHAL AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SANGOTA BHAGWANSING DOBHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Second Appeal No. 189 of 2022 by permitting withdrawal after the parties amicably resolved their dispute through a compromise agreement. The court directed both parties to act in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jun-2022

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  4. 19-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF

  5. 19-Apr-2022

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  6. 12-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/189/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Second Appeal No. 189 of 2022 by permitting withdrawal after the parties amicably resolved their dispute through a compromise agreement. The court directed both parties to act in accordance with the agreed compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case