AYODHYA PRAKASH MUNDHE vs R Y GAIKWAD AND OTHERS — CP/686/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030441202017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th January 2018

Filing Number

CP/35641/2017

Filing Date

06-11-2017

Registration No

CP/686/2017

Registration Date

21-11-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

AYODHYA PRAKASH MUNDHE

Adv. Dhage Vivek J.

Respondent(s)

R Y GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

Adv. ,Govt. Pleader,R/ 4 SERVED,Govt. Pleader,AGP FOR R.NO. 4,AGP FOR R.NO. 3 (NOA) 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

21-04-2020

NOTIFICATION

11-01-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

27-04-2018

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

05-06-2018

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

04-05-2026

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition by directing that an ongoing inquiry by the Deputy Collector, Beed be completed within three months, contingent on the petitioner furnishing details of 25 remaining candidates to the concerned authority. The court granted a three-week adjournment to allow the respondents to receive these details and proceed with the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition by directing that an ongoing inquiry by the Deputy Collector, Beed be completed within three months, contingent on the petitioner furnishing details of 25 remaining candidates to the concerned authority. The court granted a three-week adjournment to allow the respondents to receive these details and proceed with the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case