AYODHYA PRAKASH MUNDHE vs R Y GAIKWAD AND OTHERS — CP/686/2017

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Jan-2018

CNR: HCBM030441202017

Filing Number

CP/35641/2017

Filing Date

06-Nov-2017

Registration No

CP/686/2017

Registration Date

21-Nov-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYODHYA PRAKASH MUNDHE

    Adv. Dhage Vivek J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R Y GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,Govt. Pleader,R/ 4 SERVED,Govt. Pleader,AGP FOR R.NO. 4,AGP FOR R.NO. 3 (NOA) 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition by directing that an ongoing inquiry by the Deputy Collector, Beed be completed within three months, contingent on the petitioner furnishing details of 25 remaining candidates to the concerned authority. The court granted a three-week adjournment to allow the respondents to receive these details and proceed with the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Due Admission (Cp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  17. 27-Nov-2025

    Regular Admission (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  18. 21-Apr-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  19. 05-Jun-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  20. 05-Jun-2018

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal

  21. 27-Apr-2018

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale

  22. 11-Jan-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Arun M. DhavaleView PDF

  23. 11-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/686/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition by directing that an ongoing inquiry by the Deputy Collector, Beed be completed within three months, contingent on the petitioner furnishing details of 25 remaining candidates to the concerned authority. The court granted a three-week adjournment to allow the respondents to receive these details and proceed with the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case