GOVINDRAO BAJIRAO NAIKNAWARE DIED THR LRS JANAKABAI GOVINDRAO NAIKNAWARE AND ANR GHUTE AMIT T vs THE M.S.R.T.C. DIVISION AURANGABAD THR DEPOT MANAGER, OSMANABAD — CA/6202/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030439062022

Filing Number

CA/32466/2022

Filing Date

05-Dec-2022

Registration No

CA/6202/2023

Registration Date

12-May-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDRAO BAJIRAO NAIKNAWARE DIED THR LRS JANAKABAI GOVINDRAO NAIKNAWARE AND ANR GHUTE AMIT T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE M.S.R.T.C. DIVISION AURANGABAD THR DEPOT MANAGER, OSMANABAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the civil application seeking condonation of 190 days delay in filing an application to add the legal heirs of deceased appellant Govindrao Bajirao Naiknaware on record. The court permitted applicants 1-A and 1-B to be substituted as legal representatives of the original deceased appellant, with the respondent (M.S.R.T.C.) offering no objection to the relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/6202/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the civil application seeking condonation of 190 days delay in filing an application to add the legal heirs of deceased appellant Govindrao Bajirao Naiknaware on record. The court permitted applicants 1-A and 1-B to be substituted as legal representatives of the original deceased appellant, with the respondent (M.S.R.T.C.) offering no objection to the relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case