KIRAN RAOSAHEB BADE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/13028/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.

CNR: HCBM030436492025

Next Hearing

31st July 2026

Filing Number

WP/32440/2025

Filing Date

20-10-2025

Registration No

WP/13028/2025

Registration Date

31-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Representation of People Act 1950,1951
The Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act 1949

Petitioner(s)

KIRAN RAOSAHEB BADE AND OTHERS

Adv. Kedar Balbhim R.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Adv. AGP FOR R.NOS. 1, 2 AND 4 WAIVES,Patil Hanmant V FOR R.NO 5,RNO. 5 SERVED. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

10-11-2025

AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

31-07-2026

AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

08-05-2026

FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

22-12-2025

AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI,HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Kiran Raosaheb Bade and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court allowed respondent no.3's advocate to file a Vakalatnama (power of attorney) and adjourned the case to 31.07.2026 for further proceedings. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Kiran Raosaheb Bade and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court allowed respondent no.3's advocate to file a Vakalatnama (power of attorney) and adjourned the case to 31.07.2026 for further proceedings. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case