SHOBHA SHANKARRAO PADAMVAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/5026/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030435752025

Filing Number

WP/32390/2025

Filing Date

18-Oct-2025

Registration No

WP/5026/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHA SHANKARRAO PADAMVAR

    Adv. TEMAK RAHUL BHAUSAHEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE HONBLE MINISTER APPELLATE AUTHORITY

  3. 3.DESK OFFICER FOREST DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.THE DIVISIONAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST DEPARTMENT

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOREST DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed Shobha Shankarrao Padamvar's writ petition after granting her permission to withdraw it, allowing her to pursue the matter before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal instead. The court noted that time spent in prosecuting the writ petition would be credited toward the limitation period for filing before the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  4. 18-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5026/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed Shobha Shankarrao Padamvar's writ petition after granting her permission to withdraw it, allowing her to pursue the matter before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal instead. The court noted that time spent in prosecuting the writ petition would be credited toward the limitation period for filing before the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case