SHILPA B.U. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4029/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,16 AND 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030434782024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/31093/2024

Filing Date

12-11-2024

Registration No

WP/4029/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Bench Type

Division

Category

SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,16 AND 226
M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981

Petitioner(s)

SHILPA B.U.

Adv. Panpatte V. S.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION LATUR

RANI LAXMIBAI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SECRETARY

SHIV NIKETAN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

17-04-2026

FOR WITHDRAWL [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Case Summary: WP 4029/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Smt. Shilpa B.U. against the State of Maharashtra by allowing its withdrawal. The petitioner's advocate sought withdrawal upon written instructions, which were recorded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4029/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Smt. Shilpa B.U. against the State of Maharashtra by allowing its withdrawal. The petitioner's advocate sought withdrawal upon written instructions, which were recorded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case