DATTATRAYA MADHAVRAO JOGDANKAR vs SUNIL PORWAL AND OTHERS — CP/862/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Dec-2018

CNR: HCBM030433782018

Filing Number

CP/34222/2018

Filing Date

01-Nov-2018

Registration No

CP/862/2018

Registration Date

29-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act
Service - Pension

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTATRAYA MADHAVRAO JOGDANKAR

    Adv. Salgare Vitthal G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL PORWAL AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,Govt. Pleader,R.2 AND 3 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Summary of CP/862/2018 (Dattatraya Madhavrao Jogdankar v. Sunil Porwal and Others) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that all orders under contempt have been complied with. The court accepted the compliance and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2020

    Urgent Circulation (Wp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane

  4. 07-Dec-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF

  5. 07-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/862/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CP/862/2018 (Dattatraya Madhavrao Jogdankar v. Sunil Porwal and Others) The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that all orders under contempt have been complied with. The court accepted the compliance and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case