MOTILAL OSWAL HOME FINANCE LIMITED THORUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/3377/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030432892025
Filing Number
WP/32155/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
WP/3377/2026
Registration Date
30-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOTILAL OSWAL HOME FINANCE LIMITED THORUGH ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER
Adv. DESHPANDE SHREYAS SANJEEV
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AHMEDNAGAR
STATION HOUSE OFFICER RAHURI POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VIBHA KANKANWADI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME)
OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME)
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 22-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME) |
| 05-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME) |
| 19-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME) |
| 01-04-2026 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3377/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) held that borrowers who forcibly re-enter secured assets after lawful possession has been taken by a financial institution under SARFAESI Act constitute illegal conduct that cannot be countenanced. The court directed the petitioner to file an application before the Tahsildar for restoration of possession, which shall be treated as consequential/ancillary enforcement of the original possession order rather than a fresh application, and mandated police registration of criminal offences for breaking seals and trespass. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3377/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) held that borrowers who forcibly re-enter secured assets after lawful possession has been taken by a financial institution under SARFAESI Act constitute illegal conduct that cannot be countenanced. The court directed the petitioner to file an application before the Tahsildar for restoration of possession, which shall be treated as consequential/ancillary enforcement of the original possession order rather than a fresh application, and mandated police registration of criminal offences for breaking seals and trespass. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts