ASHOK IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT INDIA PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR A G RANGLANI vs JALGAON CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER — WP/3417/2017

Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act-1949. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jul-2017

CNR: HCBM030430592016

Filing Number

WP/34445/2016

Filing Date

15-Nov-2016

Registration No

WP/3417/2017

Registration Date

14-Mar-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act-1949

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT INDIA PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR A G RANGLANI

    Adv. Talhar Ajay G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JALGAON CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

    Adv. ,Patil Pradip R.,PATIL VIJAY B. FOR R.NO. 1 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3417/2017 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Ashok Irrigation Equipment India Pvt Ltd against the Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation. The court quashed the District Judge's order rejecting the condonation of delay application and condoned the approximately 5-month-25-day delay in filing an appeal, citing the petitioner's advocate's medical condition (angioplasty) as sufficient explanation. The court found the lower court's rejection unduly technical, especially given that a similar delay between the same parties was previously condoned, and held that cases should ordinarily be decided on merits rather than technicalities when delays are not gross or deliberate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 24-Jun-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  7. 24-Jun-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  8. 10-Jun-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  9. 01-Apr-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan

  10. 03-Mar-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  11. 10-Feb-2022

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  12. 04-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish DangreView PDF

  13. 16-Jul-2020

    Due Admission CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  14. 28-Aug-2017

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  15. 17-Jul-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. DeshmukhView PDF

  16. 17-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 15-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3417/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3417/2017 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by Ashok Irrigation Equipment India Pvt Ltd against the Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation. The court quashed the District Judge's order rejecting the condonation of delay application and condoned the approximately 5-month-25-day delay in filing an appeal, citing the petitioner's advocate's medical condition (angioplasty) as sufficient explanation. The court found the lower court's rejection unduly technical, especially given that a similar delay between the same parties was previously condoned, and held that cases should ordinarily be decided on merits rather than technicalities when delays are not gross or deliberate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case