NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH vs KADU FATRU KOLI AND OTHERS — ARBA/22/2024

Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030428182024

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

06-10-2024

Filing Number

ARBA/30671/2024

Filing Date

25-10-2024

Registration No

ARBA/22/2024

Registration Date

11-11-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THRU. ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR SHIVAJI V. PAWAR MANORKAR DEEPAK SURESH

Respondent(s)

KADU FATRU KOLI AND OTHERS

Adv. R/1 SERVED THROUGH SON,ADV. AMOL PATALE FOR R/3 (WAIVES),Patale Amol N,ADV. VINOD P. PATIL, FOR R/1 AND 2,Patil Vinod Prakash 1123

ARUN FATRU KOLI

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISITION AND SUB-DIVISION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

12-11-2024

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

02-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE

06-11-2025
07-10-2025
03-10-2025

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Summary of ARBA/22/2024 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed arbitration appeals filed by NHAI and civil applications by claimants (Kadu Fatru Koli and others) for withdrawal of awarded amounts. The court directed the registry to divide the granted amount and issue individual cheques to each claimant according to their equal share, as the claimants lacked a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of ARBA/22/2024 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed arbitration appeals filed by NHAI and civil applications by claimants (Kadu Fatru Koli and others) for withdrawal of awarded amounts. The court directed the registry to divide the granted amount and issue individual cheques to each claimant according to their equal share, as the claimants lacked a joint account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case