MASHNAJI SHANKARRAO MURKE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APEAL/927/2023
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030424282023
e-Filing Number
07-10-2023
Filing Number
APEAL/10358/2023
Filing Date
07-10-2023
Registration No
APEAL/927/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MASHNAJI SHANKARRAO MURKE
Adv. CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT, COURT SERVICE NOTICE OF APPELLANT IS SERVED,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. Syed G R FOR R/2 AND R/3 1123
HANMANT MADHAVRAO TAMBADWAD
Adv. Syed G R
SANDIP ANTESHWAR INGOLE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
FOR ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-10-2023 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 20-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 15-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 01-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
| 17-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CRIMINAL) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the appeal challenging the bail granted to respondents Hanmant Madhavrao Tambadwad and Sandip Anteshwar Ingole. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge properly considered the material on record and heard all parties before granting bail, and that the mere non-filing of the charge-sheet is not a valid ground to challenge a bail order. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the appeal challenging the bail granted to respondents Hanmant Madhavrao Tambadwad and Sandip Anteshwar Ingole. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge properly considered the material on record and heard all parties before granting bail, and that the mere non-filing of the charge-sheet is not a valid ground to challenge a bail order. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts