MASHNAJI SHANKARRAO MURKE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APEAL/927/2023

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030424282023

e-Filing Number

07-10-2023

Filing Number

APEAL/10358/2023

Filing Date

07-Oct-2023

Registration No

APEAL/927/2023

Registration Date

09-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 14
S.c., S.t. (Prevention Act) Section 3(1) (r) (s), 3 (1) (s)
Arms Act Section 4, 25
Maharashtra Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MASHNAJI SHANKARRAO MURKE

    Adv. CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT, COURT SERVICE NOTICE OF APPELLANT IS SERVED,CHOUDHARY DEELIP JANARDHANRAO FOR APPLICANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. Syed G R FOR R/2 AND R/3 1123

  2. 2.HANMANT MADHAVRAO TAMBADWAD

    Adv. Syed G R

  3. 3.SANDIP ANTESHWAR INGOLE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the appeal challenging the bail granted to respondents Hanmant Madhavrao Tambadwad and Sandip Anteshwar Ingole. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge properly considered the material on record and heard all parties before granting bail, and that the mere non-filing of the charge-sheet is not a valid ground to challenge a bail order. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. KhobragadeView PDF

  12. 26-Feb-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  13. 05-Feb-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi

  14. 22-Jan-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  15. 14-Dec-2023

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  16. 28-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  17. 28-Nov-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  18. 13-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  19. 13-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 07-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/927/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the appeal challenging the bail granted to respondents Hanmant Madhavrao Tambadwad and Sandip Anteshwar Ingole. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge properly considered the material on record and heard all parties before granting bail, and that the mere non-filing of the charge-sheet is not a valid ground to challenge a bail order. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case