Reliance General Insu Co Ltd USMANPURKAR ANIRUDDHA S vs Ashwini Ambadas Kadam and ors. — CA/12002/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030422212025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

CA/31337/2025

Filing Date

13-10-2025

Registration No

CA/12002/2025

Registration Date

06-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

Reliance General Insu Co Ltd USMANPURKAR ANIRUDDHA S

Respondent(s)

Ashwini Ambadas Kadam and ors.

Anuradha Ambadas Kadam

Abhijit Ambadas Kadam

Rukminbai Haribhau Kadam

Haribhau Dhondiram Kadam

Dattatraya Vijay Jagtap

Shriram Narayan Parjane

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

06-05-2026

FOR ORDERS

25-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

The Aurangabad High Court bench granted Reliance General Insurance's application to condone a 70-day delay in filing its first appeal and granted a stay on the lower tribunal's compensation award. The court permitted the respondents (claimants) to withdraw only 50% of the deposited amount with interest, keeping the remaining 50% in fixed deposit until appeal disposal, considering the insurance company's argument regarding contributory negligence of the deceased that may not have been properly evaluated by the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad High Court bench granted Reliance General Insurance's application to condone a 70-day delay in filing its first appeal and granted a stay on the lower tribunal's compensation award. The court permitted the respondents (claimants) to withdraw only 50% of the deposited amount with interest, keeping the remaining 50% in fixed deposit until appeal disposal, considering the insurance company's argument regarding contributory negligence of the deceased that may not have been properly evaluated by the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case