SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS — CP/790/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Nov-2018

CNR: HCBM030417262018

Filing Number

CP/32944/2018

Filing Date

24-Oct-2018

Registration No

CP/790/2018

Registration Date

26-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI

    Adv. Panpatte V. S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS

    Adv. R.2 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 01-Nov-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  5. 01-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/790/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case