SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS — CP/790/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030417262018
Next Hearing
01st November 2018
Filing Number
CP/32944/2018
Filing Date
24-10-2018
Registration No
CP/790/2018
Registration Date
26-10-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI
Adv. Panpatte V. S.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS
Adv. R.2 SERVED 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
NOTIFICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-11-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 03-03-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts