SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS — CP/790/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030417262018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

01st November 2018

Filing Number

CP/32944/2018

Filing Date

24-10-2018

Registration No

CP/790/2018

Registration Date

26-10-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

SHITAL SHRIPAD JOSHI

Adv. Panpatte V. S.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SHARWAREE GOKHALE AND OTHERS

Adv. R.2 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

01-11-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

03-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the court's contempt order had been complied with, though with a one-year delay. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,500 on the Education Officer (Secondary), Macchindra Kadam, to be paid to the Advocates' Bar Association Library within four weeks, as punishment for the delayed compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case