MATHURABAI DAGDU PATIL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/529/2014

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030414992014

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th December 2014

Filing Number

CP/32476/2014

Filing Date

05-12-2014

Registration No

CP/529/2014

Registration Date

08-12-2014

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

MATHURABAI DAGDU PATIL AND OTHERS

Adv. Kale Ajeet B.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. G.P. FOR R/7,R/3 TO 6 SERVED. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

19-07-2016

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

26-06-2015

URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL

02-05-2016

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

28-03-2016

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

09-12-2014

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of contempt petitions filed by Mathurabai Dagdu Patil and others against Maharashtra State, finding that the orders under contempt had already been complied with. Accordingly, all contempt petitions and their pending civil applications were disposed of, and the Acquiring Body's counsel was discharged from further appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of contempt petitions filed by Mathurabai Dagdu Patil and others against Maharashtra State, finding that the orders under contempt had already been complied with. Accordingly, all contempt petitions and their pending civil applications were disposed of, and the Acquiring Body's counsel was discharged from further appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case