JAYSINGH AMBU KUNJALE AND OTHERS vs VINOD NARAYANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS — CA/3514/2017
Case under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030413182015
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
CA/32926/2015
Filing Date
30-10-2015
Registration No
CA/3514/2017
Registration Date
10-03-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYSINGH AMBU KUNJALE AND OTHERS
Adv. APPARAO BHIMRAO KHAROSEKAR
Respondent(s)
VINOD NARAYANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS
Adv. COPY NOT SERVED ON GP,COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV L V SANGIT FOR R-7 IN WP,COPY NOT SERVED ON ADV U K PATIL AND,ADV V D GUNALE FOR R-7 IN WP 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-09-2020 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 24-06-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 26-03-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL |
| 05-03-2026 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE |
Orders
Summary of CA/3514/2017 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned multiple consolidated petitions including CA/3514/2017 (Vinod Narayanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra) to 24 June 2026 as a final opportunity. The court appointed an advocate to assist in prosecuting the Public Interest Litigation after noting petitioners' lack of engagement, and granted continuation of interim relief pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CA/3514/2017 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned multiple consolidated petitions including CA/3514/2017 (Vinod Narayanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra) to 24 June 2026 as a final opportunity. The court appointed an advocate to assist in prosecuting the Public Interest Litigation after noting petitioners' lack of engagement, and granted continuation of interim relief pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts