Sudhakar Vithoba Kakade ADV YOGESH H LAGAD vs CEO ZILLHA PARISHAD CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR AND OTHERS — CP/817/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030412992025
e-Filing Number
01-10-2025
Filing Number
CP/30644/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
CP/817/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhakar Vithoba Kakade ADV YOGESH H LAGAD
Respondent(s)
CEO ZILLHA PARISHAD CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR AND OTHERS
Adv. NOTICE OF R/1 IS SERVED,ADV. BHARAT ASARAM FULARE V. P FILED FOR R/3 AND 4 4,PULKUNDWAR SANTOSH BABURAO,ADV. SANTOSH B. PULKUNDWAR V. P FILED FO R/1,Murkute J.M.,ADV. JANARDHAN M. MURKUTE FOR R/3 AND 4 (VP),ADV. SANTOSH B. PULKUNDWAR FOR R/2 (NOA FILED) 1123
Block Development Officer Khultabad
Adv. ADV. SYED PARVEZ FOR R/2 (APPEARED IN COURT BUT VP NOT FILED)
Sarpanch Grampanchyat Sawangi Bazaar
village Development Officer
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-10-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 17-04-2026 | |
| 27-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | |
| 18-02-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Sudhakar Vithoba Kakade against the CEO Zillha Parishad and others. Both the petitioner's counsel and respondents' counsel confirmed that the previously issued orders had been complied with, rendering the contempt petition moot and without further basis for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Sudhakar Vithoba Kakade against the CEO Zillha Parishad and others. Both the petitioner's counsel and respondents' counsel confirmed that the previously issued orders had been complied with, rendering the contempt petition moot and without further basis for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts