JALGAON TALUKA MACCHIMAR SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD JALGAON THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN H D BHOI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/13414/2017

Case under Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030411362017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th January 2018

Filing Number

WP/33385/2017

Filing Date

06-10-2017

Registration No

WP/13414/2017

Registration Date

15-11-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960

Petitioner(s)

JALGAON TALUKA MACCHIMAR SAHAKARI SOCIETY LTD JALGAON THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN H D BHOI

Adv. NAGARGOJE GOVIND R

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. G.P. FOR R/1,R/2 & 4 SERVED,PATIL VIJAY BHALERAO,R/ 3 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

20-08-2020

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

11-01-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on April 17, 2026. The petitioner, Jalgaon Taluka Macchimar Sahakari Society Ltd., had challenged administrative decisions regarding water tank tender allocation for fishery purposes, but the court found that over nine years had elapsed with no substantive order passed, rendering the petition's prayers moot by efflux of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on April 17, 2026. The petitioner, Jalgaon Taluka Macchimar Sahakari Society Ltd., had challenged administrative decisions regarding water tank tender allocation for fishery purposes, but the court found that over nine years had elapsed with no substantive order passed, rendering the petition's prayers moot by efflux of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case