VITHAL YADOJI MOLKE vs THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS — CA/13661/2015

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030406252014

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

CA/31782/2014

Filing Date

28-11-2014

Registration No

CA/13661/2015

Registration Date

17-10-2015

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

VITHAL YADOJI MOLKE

Adv. Shinde Nanasaheb N.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

11-03-2020

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Case Summary: CA/13661/2015 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the Writ Petition No. 9113 of 2010 filed by Vithal Yadoji Molke against the State of Maharashtra on 08.06.2026. The petitioner retrieved case papers from his advocate on 11.05.2025 but failed to engage replacement counsel or actively pursue the petition, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/13661/2015 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the Writ Petition No. 9113 of 2010 filed by Vithal Yadoji Molke against the State of Maharashtra on 08.06.2026. The petitioner retrieved case papers from his advocate on 11.05.2025 but failed to engage replacement counsel or actively pursue the petition, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case