VITHAL YADOJI MOLKE vs THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS — CA/13661/2015

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030406252014

Filing Number

CA/31782/2014

Filing Date

28-Nov-2014

Registration No

CA/13661/2015

Registration Date

17-Oct-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VITHAL YADOJI MOLKE

    Adv. Shinde Nanasaheb N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/13661/2015 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the Writ Petition No. 9113 of 2010 filed by Vithal Yadoji Molke against the State of Maharashtra on 08.06.2026. The petitioner retrieved case papers from his advocate on 11.05.2025 but failed to engage replacement counsel or actively pursue the petition, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2020

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice B. U. Debadwar

  4. 28-Nov-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/13661/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/13661/2015 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the Writ Petition No. 9113 of 2010 filed by Vithal Yadoji Molke against the State of Maharashtra on 08.06.2026. The petitioner retrieved case papers from his advocate on 11.05.2025 but failed to engage replacement counsel or actively pursue the petition, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case