KIRAN THAKSEN TAYADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — CP/774/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030402912018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th October 2018

Filing Number

CP/31807/2018

Filing Date

15-10-2018

Registration No

CP/774/2018

Registration Date

24-10-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

KIRAN THAKSEN TAYADE

Adv. BARLINGE SUDHIR RAGHUNATH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

30-10-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

11-03-2020

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

20-08-2019

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

30-11-2018

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Kiran Thaksen Tayade against the State of Maharashtra after the state produced an order dated 10/10/2019 demonstrating full compliance with the contempt proceedings order. Finding that the requisite compliance had been achieved, the court held that no further relief was warranted and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Kiran Thaksen Tayade against the State of Maharashtra after the state produced an order dated 10/10/2019 demonstrating full compliance with the contempt proceedings order. Finding that the requisite compliance had been achieved, the court held that no further relief was warranted and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case