VILAS MAROTRAO KALYANKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/777/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 31-Oct-2018

CNR: HCBM030398962018

Filing Number

CP/31483/2018

Filing Date

11-Oct-2018

Registration No

CP/777/2018

Registration Date

24-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VILAS MAROTRAO KALYANKAR

    Adv. Panpatte V. S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,KADAM NITIN SHAMRAO 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition filed by Vilas Marotrao Kalyankar against the State of Maharashtra, finding that the direction regarding the proposal decision must have been complied with by the passage of time. The petition was dismissed as moot since the underlying directive had been fulfilled through the lapse of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 31-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  5. 31-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/777/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition filed by Vilas Marotrao Kalyankar against the State of Maharashtra, finding that the direction regarding the proposal decision must have been complied with by the passage of time. The petition was dismissed as moot since the underlying directive had been fulfilled through the lapse of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case