DIVISIONAL OFFICER BAJAJ ALLIANZE GEN INSU CO LTD DESHMUKH MOHIT RAMESHRAO vs ASHWINI SACHIN ROKADE AND OTHERS — CA/11314/2025

Case under Indian Partnership Act 1932 Section 30. Disposed: --Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030394652025

e-Filing Number

25-09-2025

Filing Number

CA/29214/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

CA/11314/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Partnership Act 1932 Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL OFFICER BAJAJ ALLIANZE GEN INSU CO LTD DESHMUKH MOHIT RAMESHRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINI SACHIN ROKADE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ANUSH SACHIN ROKADE

  3. 3.SHREYASH SACHIN ROKADE

  4. 4.SUMAN SANTOSH ROKADE

  5. 5.SUNIL MARTANDRAO LANDE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/11314/2025 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance's civil application on 7 May 2026. The court confirmed the interim stay on disbursement of funds to the respondents (Ashwini Sachin Rokade and others), finding that the appeal raised substantial questions of law and that maintaining the stay would not prejudice the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Dec-2025

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  4. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/11314/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/11314/2025 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance's civil application on 7 May 2026. The court confirmed the interim stay on disbursement of funds to the respondents (Ashwini Sachin Rokade and others), finding that the appeal raised substantial questions of law and that maintaining the stay would not prejudice the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case