AVHITRAO KONDIBA GAIKWAD AND OTHERS VAIBHAV S DESHMUKH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS — HCBM30393562025
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,226 AND 227. Next hearing: 03rd October 2025.
CNR: HCBM030393562025
Filing Number
WP/29142/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Judge
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Coram
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVHITRAO KONDIBA GAIKWAD AND OTHERS VAIBHAV S DESHMUKH
-
2.DADA KONDIBA GAIKWAD DIED THROUGH LRS RUKHMANBAI DADARAO GAIKWAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AURANGABAD
-
3.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION 1
Case History
-
03-Oct-2025
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Third Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
15-Jun-2026
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard 37 consolidated Writ Petitions (ST) on 15/06/2026. This was the third hearing for removal of office objections. Since no petitioners appeared and objections remained uncured despite previous extensions, the court granted a final two-week deadline to remove the objections, warning that failure would result in automatic refusal of registration without further reference to the Registrar (Judicial). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (Second Time)
Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)
-
08-Jun-2026
Objections Not Removed (First Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard 37 consolidated Writ Petitions (ST) on 15/06/2026. This was the third hearing for removal of office objections. Since no petitioners appeared and objections remained uncured despite previous extensions, the court granted a final two-week deadline to remove the objections, warning that failure would result in automatic refusal of registration without further reference to the Registrar (Judicial). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts