DIMPAL NIKHILKUMAR SANKLECHA SUNIKET A KULKARNI AND RUTUJA L. JAKHADE vs NIKHILKUMAR NANDAKUMAR SANKLECHA — WP/12217/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030391112025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/28948/2025

Filing Date

24-09-2025

Registration No

WP/12217/2025

Registration Date

03-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954 Section ---

Petitioner(s)

DIMPAL NIKHILKUMAR SANKLECHA SUNIKET A KULKARNI AND RUTUJA L. JAKHADE

Respondent(s)

NIKHILKUMAR NANDAKUMAR SANKLECHA

Adv. TUNGAR HRISHIKESH V. FOR RESPONDENT 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

06-10-2025

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

15-04-2026

FIRST ON BOARD [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

26-03-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

25-03-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

13-02-2026

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR

Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the wife's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order directing her psychiatric examination in a divorce case. While confirming that matrimonial courts have power to order medical examinations under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the court held that such orders cannot be passed casually without prima facie evidence establishing necessity; the lower court's order lacked sufficient reasoning and failed to demonstrate grounds for the examination. The court permitted the husband to refile with proper evidence supporting a prima facie case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the wife's writ petition and quashed the lower court's order directing her psychiatric examination in a divorce case. While confirming that matrimonial courts have power to order medical examinations under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the court held that such orders cannot be passed casually without prima facie evidence establishing necessity; the lower court's order lacked sufficient reasoning and failed to demonstrate grounds for the examination. The court permitted the husband to refile with proper evidence supporting a prima facie case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case