SHRI OMKARDAS DAYALDAS AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER vs THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OP SOCIETIES BHUSAWAL THRO GP AND OTHERS — WP/60/2018
Case under Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030391092016
Filing Number
WP/31282/2016
Filing Date
06-Oct-2016
Registration No
WP/60/2018
Registration Date
03-Jan-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI OMKARDAS DAYALDAS AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER
Adv. PAWAR VIKARM ANANDRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OP SOCIETIES BHUSAWAL THRO GP AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Shri Omkardas Dayaldas Agrawal and another against the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bhusawal as infructuous on May 7, 2026. The petitioner's counsel conceded that due to passage of time, the petition had become devoid of any live controversy, and the court accordingly found nothing surviving for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
03-Sep-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
03-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2017
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. R. JoshiView PDF
-
20-Feb-2017
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. R. JoshiView PDF
-
06-Oct-2016
Case filed
Registration No. WP/60/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Shri Omkardas Dayaldas Agrawal and another against the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bhusawal as infructuous on May 7, 2026. The petitioner's counsel conceded that due to passage of time, the petition had become devoid of any live controversy, and the court accordingly found nothing surviving for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts